Blog

Parents debating when to let their child open an Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat or other social media account have a new piece of research to consider. A major study published in Nature Human Behaviour in August 2026 found that children who began using social media earlier tended to perform worse later in school, particularly in mathematics and their native language. The differences were not tiny. For some students, researchers estimated the gap was roughly equivalent to six months of learning. The study, titled Longitudinal effect of early social media use on standardized learning outcomes during school career, followed the academic histories of 5,227 students in northern Italy and compared standardized test performance with the age at which students reported opening their first personal social media account. Read the study in Nature Human Behaviour The results add an important new dimension to the ongoing debate over kids and screens. The question may not simply be how much time children spend online. When they begin using social media may matter too. Researchers Looked at Years of School Performance One of the strengths of this research is that it did not simply ask teenagers whether they believed social media hurt their grades. Researchers combined students' reported digital histories with standardized test records collected by Italy's National Institute for the Evaluation of the Education and Training System, known as INVALSI. Those records allowed researchers to examine performance in Italian, mathematics and English at different points during the students' education. The students' digital histories included when they first received smartphones, began independently using computers or tablets, used messaging apps and opened personal social media accounts. Social media arrived early for many of them. Researchers found that 11.4% had opened an account during primary school, 29.3% during sixth grade, 25.1% during seventh grade and 17.9% during eighth grade. Only 16.4% waited until ninth grade or later. Because researchers did not have enough academic data from before social media adoption for the children who joined during primary school, those earliest users could not be included in the main longitudinal analysis. The main comparisons therefore looked at students who opened accounts in sixth, seventh or eighth grade against similar students who waited until ninth grade or later. Earlier Social Media Use Was Linked to Lower Scores The pattern researchers found was striking. Students who created their first social media account in sixth grade, roughly age 11 or 12, scored about 0.21 standard deviations lower in Italian and 0.17 lower in mathematics by eighth grade compared with students who waited until ninth grade or later. The difference did not disappear as students got older. By tenth grade, students who began social media in sixth grade were approximately 0.22 standard deviations lower in Italian and 0.27 lower in mathematics. Starting a little later appeared to be associated with smaller differences. Students who opened accounts in seventh grade showed smaller academic gaps, while those beginning in eighth grade had smaller gaps still. By tenth grade, eighth-grade adopters were about 0.11 standard deviations lower in both Italian and math compared with the later-adoption group. In other words, researchers found something resembling a gradient: the earlier students entered social media, the larger the later academic difference tended to be. Could the Difference Really Equal Six Months of School? This is one of the study's most attention-grabbing findings, but it needs some context. There is no official formula that converts an INVALSI test-score difference into "months of learning." The researchers noted that some education researchers use approximately 0.4 standard deviations as an informal equivalent of one year of learning. Using that benchmark, the difference between children beginning social media in sixth grade and comparable students waiting until ninth grade worked out to approximately six months of learning. So six months should be viewed as an illustration of the magnitude of the difference, not as proof that every child who joins Instagram at 11 literally loses half a school year. Still, the size of the difference was large enough to get researchers' attention. One Subject Didn't Follow the Pattern: English There was one surprising exception. Researchers found no evidence that earlier social media adoption negatively affected English performance. Because English was a foreign language for these Italian students, the researchers suggested one possible explanation: social media itself exposes young people to a tremendous amount of English-language content. Videos, music, memes, games, creators and conversations online could provide incidental English exposure that partially counteracts the negative effects seen in other subjects. That explanation is plausible, but the study did not directly prove that this was the reason. Constant Phone Checking May Be Part of the Problem Perhaps the most useful finding for parents involves how children use their phones. The researchers examined what they called smartphone pervasiveness, essentially the degree to which smartphones intruded into important moments of everyday life. Students with higher levels of pervasive smartphone use tended to perform worse academically and were also more likely to have opened social media accounts earlier. According to the researchers' analysis, smartphone pervasiveness could account for a meaningful portion of the relationship between early social media use and later performance, particularly in mathematics. The obvious concern is attention. Social media isn't confined to the 30 minutes someone consciously decides to spend scrolling. A phone can create dozens or hundreds of tiny interruptions throughout a day: checking a notification during homework, looking at a message during dinner, picking up the phone before bed or wondering what is happening online while trying to concentrate on something else. Lead researcher Marco Gui described this as a kind of continuous state of alert, in which young people feel compelled to repeatedly check what is happening online. That distinction matters. For families trying to establish healthy technology habits, the issue may be less about simply counting total "screen time" and more about preventing technology from fragmenting the periods children need for reading, studying, sleeping, talking, playing and simply concentrating on one activity at a time. Parental Supervision May Help The study also found that children who began social media earlier were less likely to report having parental supervision of their social media use. Parental controls and parental access to children's online activities were associated with better academic scores, although parental controls themselves explained only a small portion of the overall relationship between early social media adoption and performance. That suggests that supervision may help, but it probably isn't a magic solution. Giving an 11-year-old unrestricted access to highly engaging social platforms and then relying exclusively on parental controls may not address the larger issue of attention and habitual checking. Does This Study Prove Social Media Causes Lower Grades? No, and this is an important distinction. This was a longitudinal observational study, not a randomized experiment. Researchers used sophisticated statistical methods, including matching students based on characteristics that could affect both social media adoption and academic performance. They also examined students' academic performance before social media exposure and conducted several robustness checks. Those techniques make the research considerably stronger than a simple survey showing that heavy social media users have lower grades. But they cannot eliminate every possible explanation. There could still be unmeasured differences between children who receive social media accounts at 11 and children whose families wait until 14 or 15. Personality, family dynamics, peer groups and changing life circumstances could potentially contribute to the results. Independent experts reviewing the paper for the Science Media Centre generally described the research as strong and important while cautioning against interpreting it as definitive proof that early social media use directly causes poorer academic performance. Read independent expert reactions to the study That nuance shouldn't obscure the finding, however. Earlier social media adoption was consistently associated with poorer performance in Italian and mathematics even after researchers attempted to account for numerous other differences. What Should Parents Take Away From the Research? The study does not establish a perfect age at which every child should be allowed onto social media. It does provide another argument against the assumption that there is no downside to letting children start simply because "all their friends already have it." Waiting appears to be a reasonable option. Parents can also focus on the behaviors highlighted by the research: reduce habitual phone checking, keep devices away during homework and meals, protect sleep from late-night notifications, establish clear family expectations and encourage activities that allow children to become absorbed without constant digital interruptions. Just as importantly, children need things to do when they're not on their phones. Reading a book, creating something, playing outside, talking with family or listening to someone they love read a favorite story may look simple compared with an endless stream of algorithmically selected content. That's precisely the point. Not every moment of childhood needs to compete for a child's attention. The Bigger Picture: Delay May Be a Feature, Not a Failure Parents are under enormous pressure to give children access to technology earlier. A smartphone can feel like a milestone. A social media account can feel socially necessary. And when classmates already have them, saying "not yet" can feel as if you're holding your child back. This study suggests another way of looking at that decision. Waiting may actually give children something valuable: more time to develop their ability to focus, learn, read, sleep and navigate relationships before introducing platforms specifically engineered to demand their attention. The researchers themselves emphasize that the subject remains complex and that their findings should be interpreted carefully. More studies in different countries and populations will be needed. But for parents wondering whether an 11-year-old really needs a personal social media account right now, the evidence supporting "not yet" is getting harder to ignore. Sources and Further Reading Nature Human Behaviour: Longitudinal effect of early social media use on standardized learning outcomes during school career Nature Human Behaviour research briefing: Negative influence of early social media use on school outcomes University of Milano-Bicocca: EYES UP research project findings Science Media Centre: Independent expert reaction to the study

Toddler Screen Time and Emotional Development: What a New Study Found Toddlers change quickly. Between their first and third birthdays, they become more mobile, more independent and much more interested in the world around them. This is also a period when many children begin spending more time watching television, videos and other digital media. A new study published in BMC Public Health examined how changes in screen time and physical activity during toddlerhood were associated with children’s social-emotional development. The researchers found two separate patterns: toddlers whose daily screen time increased more tended to have slightly higher social-emotional difficulty scores, while toddlers whose moderate-to-vigorous physical activity increased tended to have lower difficulty scores. The study does not prove that screens directly cause behavioral problems or that additional exercise prevents them. However, it adds to growing evidence that the habits children develop during toddlerhood may matter for emotional regulation, behavior and overall well-being. What did the toddler screen time study examine? The study, titled “Associations of Changes in Physical Activity and Screen Time and Social-Emotional Development Among Toddlers,” was published online in July 2026. Researchers analyzed data from the Child and Mother Physical Activity Study, a longitudinal project involving families in the Chicago metropolitan area. The final analysis included 116 children. Researchers examined changes between approximately 1½ and 2½ years of age. The study measured: Daily television, smartphone and tablet viewing, as reported by mothers Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, measured with hip-worn accelerometers Social-emotional functioning, measured with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire The questionnaire assesses areas such as emotional difficulties, conduct problems, hyperactivity, peer difficulties and prosocial behavior. A higher total difficulty score indicates more reported behavioral or emotional difficulties. Screen time increased substantially during toddlerhood At the beginning of the study period, children averaged approximately 43 minutes of screen time per day. One year later, average daily screen time had risen to approximately 69 minutes. That represents an average increase of about 25 minutes per day. Roughly three-quarters of the children’s screen exposure came from television, rather than smartphones or tablets. The researchers noted that their measurement focused mainly on watching videos and television, so it may not have captured every form of digital media use. The increase is important because toddlerhood is often when screens begin to become part of everyday routines. Parents may introduce videos during meals, while preparing dinner, during travel or when a child is upset or bored. Occasional screen use is not the same as constant or unrestricted access. Still, small additions throughout the day can quickly add up. More screen time was associated with more difficulties After accounting for factors including the child’s age, sex, neighborhood resources and earlier behavioral scores, researchers estimated that a 30-minute annualized increase in daily screen time was associated with a 0.5-point increase in the child’s total difficulty score. The effect was statistically significant but relatively small. The researchers emphasized that the clinical importance of a half-point difference is difficult to determine for an individual child. However, even small associations may matter at the population level because screen use is common and highly modifiable. The association appeared to be driven primarily by externalizing behaviors, a category that includes conduct difficulties and hyperactivity, rather than internalizing difficulties such as anxiety or emotional distress. This does not mean that adding 30 minutes of television will automatically cause a toddler to develop behavioral problems. It means that, across this group of children, larger increases in screen exposure were associated with somewhat less favorable social-emotional scores. More physical activity was associated with better scores The study also found that toddlers became more active as they grew. Average moderate-to-vigorous physical activity increased from approximately 72 minutes to 90 minutes per day. A 30-minute annualized increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was associated with a one-point reduction in total difficulty scores. Increased activity was also associated with lower externalizing behavior scores. For toddlers, moderate-to-vigorous activity does not need to look like formal exercise. It can include: Running and chasing games Dancing Climbing Playing with balls Walking outdoors Riding toys Playground activities Active pretend play Simple indoor obstacle courses Movement gives toddlers opportunities to practice coordination, manage frustration, solve problems and interact with other people. The researchers suggest that active play may support the integration of children’s physical, cognitive and emotional development. Exercise did not appear to cancel out screen time One of the study’s most useful findings was that changes in screen time and physical activity were not strongly connected. Children who became more active did not necessarily spend less time on screens. Some toddlers may have had both high levels of physical activity and relatively high screen exposure. That means parents should not assume that an active morning at the playground automatically offsets several hours of screen use later in the day. The study suggests that screen exposure and physical activity may be separate parts of a child’s routine, each with its own potential relationship to social-emotional development. Families may benefit from addressing both: Creating more opportunities for movement and active play Preventing screen time from expanding unnecessarily Researchers described this as a “dual-focus” approach rather than simply replacing one behavior with the other. Why might screen time affect toddler behavior? The study was not designed to determine precisely why screen use was associated with social-emotional difficulties. However, the authors discussed several possible explanations. Screens may crowd out developmental experiences Time spent watching videos can replace activities such as: Talking with caregivers Reading books Imaginative play Exploring physical objects Practicing language Playing with other children Learning to manage boredom These everyday experiences help toddlers develop communication, patience, problem-solving and emotional regulation. Screen use may be most concerning when it repeatedly displaces these experiences, rather than because every minute of screen exposure is inherently harmful. Fast-paced content may be overstimulating Rapidly changing images, loud sounds and highly attention-grabbing content may place heavy demands on young children’s still-developing attention and self-regulation systems. The study’s authors presented this as a possible explanation, not a proven mechanism. More research is needed to determine how content speed, quality and design affect toddlers differently. Screens may become a default calming tool Parents often reach for a phone or video when a toddler becomes restless, frustrated or upset. This is understandable, especially during travel, work demands or stressful moments. But when screens become the primary response to every difficult emotion, children may have fewer opportunities to practice calming themselves with support from a caregiver. The American Academy of Pediatrics’ current media guidance encourages parents to consider the child, the content, how the child learns to calm down, what media is crowding out and ongoing communication. The AAP refers to these principles as the “5 C’s of Media Guidance.” What are the current screen time recommendations for toddlers? The World Health Organization’s guidelines for children under age 5 recommend: No sedentary screen time for 1-year-olds No more than one hour per day for 2-year-olds, with less being preferable At least 180 minutes of varied physical activity throughout the day for children ages 1 and 2 The 180-minute activity recommendation includes movement at different intensity levels. It does not mean a toddler must perform three hours of strenuous exercise. The goal is frequent movement and play spread throughout the day. The AAP’s latest guidance also stresses that parents should look beyond a single number. Content quality, adult involvement, family circumstances and what media replaces all affect the experience. A short, age-appropriate program watched with a caregiver is different from hours of unsupervised autoplay videos. Practical ways to reduce toddler screen time Reducing screen use does not require eliminating every device overnight. Gradual, predictable changes are often easier for both parents and children. Protect a few screen-free parts of the day Start with routines that offer the greatest developmental benefits, such as: Meals The hour before bedtime Outdoor time Reading time The first part of the morning Clear routines are often easier for toddlers to accept than limits that change from day to day. Replace the screen instead of simply removing it Toddlers are less likely to protest when they are offered something concrete to do. Possible screen-free alternatives include: Board books Music and dancing Stickers Blocks Water play Play dough Toy animals Simple puzzles Drawing Helping with household tasks The replacement does not need to be elaborate. Toddlers often get more developmental value from a cardboard box and an involved adult than from an expensive electronic toy. Add short bursts of activity Movement can be spread across the day. Ten minutes of dancing, a short walk and an indoor chasing game all count. Parents do not need to create a formal exercise program. The main goal is to give toddlers frequent opportunities to move freely and safely. Avoid open access to phones and tablets When a device is always visible and available, toddlers are more likely to request it repeatedly. Keeping devices out of reach and using them at predictable times can reduce negotiations and tantrums. The AAP also recommends turning off autoplay and notifications, which are designed to keep users engaged longer. Make reading an easy default Reading and storytelling provide attention, language, emotional connection and quiet entertainment without a screen. The WHO specifically encourages reading and storytelling with a caregiver during sedentary time. When a parent or grandparent cannot always be present, the Recordable Book Buddy offers another screen-free option. It attaches to the back cover of any children’s picture book and turns it into a personalized read along experience, starring you. A loved one records the story page by page, allowing the child to hear a familiar voice while following along with the physical book. Important limitations of the study Parents should not interpret this research as definitive proof that screen time causes social-emotional problems. The study had several important limitations: It included only 116 children. The participants were drawn from one metropolitan area. Many mothers were highly educated and lived in well-resourced neighborhoods. Screen time was reported by mothers rather than measured electronically. Screen use in childcare settings may have been missed. Researchers measured video viewing but did not examine content quality. The follow-up period was only about one year. The study was observational, so other family or environmental factors may have contributed to the results. The physical-activity measurement was a major strength because it used accelerometers rather than relying only on parent estimates. Still, the authors said that larger and more socioeconomically diverse studies are needed. The paper is also currently presented as an unedited article-in-press manuscript and may receive additional copyediting before final publication. The takeaway for parents The study does not suggest that parents should panic over an occasional cartoon or feel guilty whenever they need a break. Its more practical message is that routines can gradually shift during toddlerhood. An extra video here and an additional half hour there can become a significant increase over the course of a year. At the same time, physical activity appears to have its own potential benefits. More movement does not automatically mean less screen exposure, so families may need to work on both habits separately. The goal is not a perfectly screen-free childhood. It is a daily routine in which screens do not consistently replace movement, conversation, reading, imaginative play, sleep and emotional connection. For toddlers, those real-world experiences remain difficult for any screen to reproduce. Frequently asked questions Does screen time cause behavioral problems in toddlers? This study found an association between increases in screen time and higher social-emotional difficulty scores. It did not prove that screen time directly caused the difficulties. How much screen time should a 2-year-old have? The WHO recommends no more than one hour of sedentary screen time per day for 2-year-olds, with less considered better. Families should also consider content quality, adult involvement and what screen use is replacing. How much physical activity does a toddler need? The WHO recommends at least 180 minutes of varied physical activity spread throughout the day for children ages 1 and 2. This includes ordinary movement and active play, not just vigorous exercise. Can physical activity offset too much screen time? The new study suggests that the two behaviors may operate independently. Increasing physical activity may be beneficial, but it should not be treated as a way to cancel out excessive screen exposure. What are good screen-free activities for toddlers? Reading, storytelling, dancing, outdoor play, blocks, puzzles, music, drawing, sensory play and simple household tasks can all provide screen-free engagement. Sources and further reading Original BMC Public Health study World Health Organization guidelines for children under 5 WHO recommendations at a glance American Academy of Pediatrics: Helping Kids Thrive in a Digital World AAP 5 C’s guidance for toddlers and preschoolers

For today’s children, going online is not a special event. It is part of everyday life. A new report from Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, “Growing Up Online: Parenting Young Children in the Digital Age,” examines how children ages 3 to 10 use digital technology and how parents are trying to manage the risks, benefits, and pressures that come with it. The report is based on a nationally representative survey of 2,008 Australian parents and caregivers conducted in September 2025. It focused on children’s internet use outside school, preschool, and formal childcare settings. The results show that the question facing parents is no longer whether young children will use the internet. The real question is how families can help children use it safely, intentionally, and without allowing online activities to crowd out the rest of childhood. Nearly Every Young Child Has Been Online According to the survey, 97% of children ages 3 to 10 had been online at some point, and 94% had used the internet during the four weeks before the survey. Children commonly accessed the internet through: Tablets Smart televisions Smartphones Gaming consoles Computers Smart home devices More than half of parents, 57%, reported that their child had at least one internet-connected device of their own. Device ownership increased significantly with age. Only 29% of children ages 3 to 4 had their own device, compared with 83% of children ages 9 to 10. This rapid increase in access means that digital parenting must begin well before the teenage years. By the time many families start thinking seriously about online safety, children may already have years of experience using connected devices. Children Go Online for More Than Entertainment Entertainment was the most common reason children used the internet. Ninety-six percent of parents whose children had been online said their child used it for fun. However, children were also going online to: Learn new things Complete homework Find information Communicate with family Maintain friendships Listen to music, podcasts, or audiobooks Explore personal interests Seventy-one percent used the internet for learning, while 42% used it to find information and 42% used it for homework. Nearly three-quarters had used an educational game, website, or app. The reasons changed as children grew older. Among children ages 9 to 10, 69% used the internet for homework, 61% used it to find information, and approximately half used it for communication or social connection. This is an important distinction. Not all online activity serves the same purpose. Watching an endless stream of recommended videos is different from video-calling a grandparent, researching a favorite animal, listening to an audiobook, or completing a school assignment. Parents may therefore get more useful results by looking at what children are doing online, not simply counting every minute of screen use as though it were identical. Social Media and AI Are Reaching Children Early One of the report’s more striking findings is how early children are encountering technologies commonly associated with teenagers and adults. Almost one-third of parents, 31%, reported that their child had used a social media platform or app such as TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, or Snapchat. Most accessed these platforms through someone else’s account or without an account, although 6% reportedly had their own social media profile. Social media use increased with age. Sixteen percent of children ages 3 to 4 had used a mainstream social media platform, compared with 41% of children ages 9 to 10. Newer technology is also becoming part of childhood. Fifteen percent of parents said their child had used an artificial intelligence assistant or companion, while 10% said their child had used a virtual reality headset. Among children ages 9 to 10, 25% had used an AI assistant or companion. These findings suggest that conversations about algorithms, AI-generated information, advertising, privacy, and online influence may need to begin earlier than many adults expect. Parents See Real Benefits Although parents often expressed anxiety about their children going online, they also recognized that digital technology can provide meaningful benefits. When given a list of possible benefits, 96% of parents whose children had been online identified at least one positive outcome. The most commonly reported benefits were: Having fun or relaxing Learning letters, words, numbers, or reading skills Learning about the world Exploring hobbies and interests Developing creativity Building digital skills Staying connected with family and friends Seventy-four percent said the internet helped their child have fun or relax. The same percentage said it helped with learning or understanding the world, and 74% reported benefits involving interests, hobbies, or creativity. The benefits also changed with age. Parents of younger children were more likely to report improvements in foundational literacy and number skills. Parents of older children were more likely to report benefits involving exploration, digital skills, and social connection. The report does not support the idea that digital media is entirely harmful or entirely beneficial. Its findings point toward a more realistic conclusion: the value of online activity depends on the child, the content, the context, and how adults support the experience. The Internet Has Become a Parenting Tool The research also recognizes a reality that is often missing from debates about children and screen time: parents sometimes need digital technology to get through the day. About two-thirds of parents said they had used the internet at least once a week to occupy their child while they took a break or had some downtime. A similar percentage used it while working from home or completing household chores. Parents also used online content to support household routines. Forty-six percent had used music, podcasts, audiobooks, or meditation apps at least once a week to help their child wind down or sleep. At the same time, 64% had regularly used the internet to have fun or connect with their child, including playing games or looking at content together. Parents should not be made to feel guilty for occasionally using a screen so they can cook dinner, finish a work call, care for another child, or simply take a breath. The report specifically calls for practical, accessible, and nonjudgmental guidance that recognizes the competing demands families face. Parents Are Worried, and Often Overwhelmed When parents were asked how they felt about their children being online, 67% initially described negative feelings, particularly worry and anxiety. Nearly two-thirds identified at least one challenge associated with their child’s internet use. The most common concern was that online activities interfered with other parts of life. Parents reported that internet use had: Interfered with other activities, 48% Created family conflict, 22% Exposed children to age-inappropriate content, 22% Contributed to emotional difficulties, 15% More than half were at least somewhat concerned about the amount of time their child had recently spent online. These concerns became more common as children grew older and gained greater access to personal devices, social media, gaming, messaging, and independent browsing. Most Parents Are Already Taking Safety Steps Parents are not ignoring the risks. Among families whose children could access an internet-connected device at home: 95% had at least one rule governing device use. 77% used at least one parental control. 74% monitored activities such as app downloads or search history. 87% had proactively discussed online safety with their child. However, 73% still found helping their child stay safe online at least somewhat challenging. Parents were also less likely to discuss certain complicated subjects. Only 33% had talked about what to do after seeing sexual images online, and 31% had discussed how algorithms influence what people see. Parental controls and restrictions remain useful, but they cannot replace communication. Children eventually use devices outside direct adult supervision. They need to understand why safety rules exist and know that they can ask for help without automatically losing access or getting into trouble. Five Practical Lessons for Families 1. Start online safety conversations early Online safety should not begin with one serious conversation when a child receives a phone. It can begin with simple lessons for preschoolers: “Tell me if something makes you scared.” “Do not share your name or address.” “Ask before clicking a new video or game.” As children mature, these conversations can expand to privacy, advertising, misinformation, algorithms, online friendships, AI, and harmful content. 2. Watch, play, and explore together Co-viewing and co-playing allow parents to understand what their children enjoy while creating natural opportunities to discuss safety. The report recommends regular joint engagement because it can improve the quality of children’s digital experiences and make them more comfortable speaking up when something goes wrong. 3. Create predictable routines Rules work better when they are consistent and understandable. Families might establish device-free meals, charging stations outside bedrooms, limits on autoplay, or specific times when entertainment screens are available. A written family technology agreement can help children participate in setting expectations rather than simply receiving orders. The eSafety Commissioner provides both family technology agreements and conversation resources for parents. 4. Protect important offline activities Instead of focusing exclusively on a precise daily screen-time number, parents can watch for displacement. Is online activity interfering with: Sleep? Reading? Outdoor activity? Family conversation? School responsibilities? Creative play? In-person friendships? The study found that interference with other activities was parents’ most commonly reported challenge. The goal is not necessarily to remove every screen. It is to make sure screens do not consume the parts of childhood that cannot be replaced. 5. Adjust the approach as children grow Younger children generally benefit from close supervision, simple rules, shared use, and predictable routines. Older children need increasing involvement in decisions about balance, privacy, healthy digital habits, and help-seeking. They may also need more direct conversations about social media, messaging, online strangers, algorithms, AI, and emotionally manipulative content. Parents Cannot Carry the Entire Burden The report makes another critical point: keeping children safe online cannot be the responsibility of parents alone. Technology companies must build safer products, improve moderation, simplify parental controls, and make the strongest privacy and safety protections the default for children. Parents should not need advanced technical knowledge to prevent a young child from encountering inappropriate content. Families can set rules and teach good habits, but platforms still control the algorithms, product designs, privacy settings, and recommendation systems children encounter. Finding a Healthier Digital Balance Children’s online and offline lives are no longer completely separate. Digital technology can support education, creativity, communication, relaxation, and family connection. It can also contribute to conflict, distraction, inappropriate exposure, and the loss of time for other important activities. The answer is not panic, shame, or the expectation of perfect parenting. It is ongoing involvement. Parents can create safer digital habits by remaining curious about what their children do online, setting developmentally appropriate boundaries, sharing digital experiences, protecting screen-free routines, and making sure children know they can ask for help. The internet will continue to change. The most important protection parents can give children is not a single setting or restriction. It is a strong, open relationship that allows online safety conversations to grow along with them.

Most conversations about children and technology focus on how much time kids spend looking at screens. But new research raises another important question: How does a parent’s phone use affect a child who is trying to connect with them? A 2026 study published in Frontiers in Psychology found that teenagers who perceived their caregivers as frequently distracted by phones and other devices were also more likely to report insecure attachment to those caregivers. The association appeared in relationships with both mother-like and father-like caregivers. The study does not prove that checking a phone causes attachment problems. However, it adds to growing evidence that what researchers call parental technoference may affect how children experience attention, availability and emotional connection at home. What Is Parental Technoference? “Technoference” describes situations in which technology interrupts or interferes with an in-person relationship. A related term, “phubbing,” combines “phone” and “snubbing” and refers to ignoring someone in favor of a phone. A parent can be physically in the same room as their child while appearing mentally somewhere else. Researchers sometimes describe this experience as “absent presence.” This might happen when a parent: Checks notifications while a child is talking Scrolls during dinner or family time Answers messages throughout a child’s performance or activity Continues looking at a device when a child asks for attention Regularly interrupts conversations to respond to the phone These moments may seem small to an adult, especially when the phone is being used for work, scheduling or family responsibilities. But repeated interruptions may feel different from a child’s perspective. What Did the Study Examine? The researchers surveyed 600 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 17 from the general U.S. population. Participants answered questions about their primary caregiver’s device habits and their own relationship with that caregiver. The teenagers rated statements such as: Their caregiver’s device use negatively affects their relationship Their caregiver ignores them while using a device Their caregiver does not spend enough time with them because of device use They feel unimportant when their caregiver will not put down a device They have conflicts with their caregiver about device use The researchers used these responses to evaluate a new measurement tool called the Device Attachment Interference Scale, or DAIS. They then compared the results with measures of anxious and avoidant attachment. What Did the Researchers Find? Higher levels of perceived caregiver device interference were significantly associated with higher levels of both anxious and avoidant attachment. The pattern was found among teenagers who identified a mother-like figure as their primary caregiver and among those who identified a father-like figure. The researchers controlled for the adolescents’ age and gender in their analysis. In practical terms, adolescents who felt that devices repeatedly competed for their caregiver’s attention were more likely to describe relationship patterns involving emotional insecurity. Anxious attachment may involve: Worrying about whether a caregiver is emotionally available Seeking frequent reassurance Feeling uncertain about the strength of the relationship Becoming especially sensitive to signs of rejection or inattention Avoidant attachment may involve: Becoming emotionally distant Avoiding dependence on a caregiver Hesitating to ask for comfort or support Learning to expect that bids for attention will not be answered The study’s central issue was not simply how many hours parents used their phones. It was whether teenagers felt that a device made their caregiver less attentive, less responsive or less available when connection was needed. Nearly Half of Teens Notice Distracted Parenting The new findings reflect an experience many families already recognize. A 2024 Pew Research Center survey found that 46% of teenagers said a parent was at least sometimes distracted by a phone while the teen was trying to talk to them. Parents viewed their own habits more favorably, with 31% saying this happened regularly. An earlier Pew survey found that 68% of parents said they were at least sometimes distracted by their smartphone while spending time with their children. Parents are not necessarily choosing their phones over their children intentionally. Smartphones now function as workstations, calendars, cameras, maps, news sources, banking tools and communication devices. The problem may be less about owning or using a phone and more about allowing it to interrupt the moments when children are seeking attention and connection. What the Research Does Not Prove This study should not be interpreted as proof that parental phone use directly causes insecure attachment. The researchers clearly identified several limitations: The study was cross-sectional, meaning information was collected at one point in time. The results show an association, not cause and effect. Both device interference and attachment were reported by the adolescents themselves. Teenagers who already feel insecure may be more sensitive to parental distraction. Other family or relationship factors may influence both attachment and perceptions of phone use. The new Device Attachment Interference Scale requires additional validation. The researchers also noted that some questions about emotional reactions to device use may partially overlap with questions measuring anxious attachment. Longer-term studies involving parents, adolescents and direct observations of family interactions will be needed. The responsible conclusion is not that every phone interruption damages a child. It is that frequent perceived inattention was meaningfully connected with how teenagers described the security of their caregiver relationship. Five Ways Parents Can Reduce Phone Distraction Parents do not need to abandon technology. A more realistic goal is to protect certain interactions from unnecessary interruption. 1. Respond to bids for attention When a child says, “Look at this,” asks a question or begins telling a story, pause before checking the phone. Not every conversation can happen immediately. When attention must be delayed, acknowledge the child directly: “I need two minutes to finish this message, and then I want to hear the whole story.” A clear response is different from appearing not to notice. 2. Establish phone-free family moments Designate a few predictable times when phones are put away or silenced. These might include: Family meals Bedtime routines Reading time School pickup Short car trips The first few minutes after arriving home Important conversations The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends creating screen-free zones and times, including family meals and bedtime, to support face-to-face connection, learning and sleep. 3. Turn off unnecessary notifications Every sound, banner and vibration creates a small invitation to leave the current conversation. Use “Do Not Disturb,”

The conversation around children's screen time has changed dramatically over the past decade. While technology can provide educational opportunities and help families stay connected, a new advisory from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services makes one thing clear: Excessive and unhealthy screen use has become a public health concern for children and adolescents. The newly released U.S. Surgeon General's Advisory on the Harms of Screen Use summarizes the latest research and provides practical guidance for families, schools, healthcare providers, and technology companies. Rather than simply telling parents to "reduce screen time," the report explains why screen habits matter and how families can build healthier relationships with technology. Key Findings from the Surgeon General's Advisory The report highlights several growing concerns linked to excessive screen use. 1. Screen Exposure Begins Earlier Than Ever Many children are exposed to screens before their first birthday. By the teenage years, children may spend more time using screens than sleeping or attending school. 2. Language Development Can Be Affected One of the strongest concerns involves early childhood. The advisory notes that excessive screen exposure during a child's earliest years is associated with poorer language development and developmental outcomes. Young children learn language most effectively through face-to-face conversations, reading together, and interactive play rather than passive media consumption. 3. Sleep Suffers Healthy sleep is essential for learning, emotional regulation, and physical growth. The report identifies screen use, especially before bedtime, as a significant contributor to disrupted sleep. Blue light exposure, constant notifications, and stimulating online content can make it more difficult for children to fall asleep and stay asleep. 4. Mental Health Risks Increase For adolescents, heavy screen use, particularly social media, has been linked with increased risks of: Anxiety Depression Poor emotional well-being Reduced self-esteem Social isolation The advisory emphasizes that the risks extend beyond social media alone and include compulsive gaming, endless scrolling, and other digital behaviors that replace healthy real-world experiences. 5. Learning and Academic Performance May Decline Research summarized in the advisory links excessive recreational screen use with: Lower classroom performance Reduced attention Less physical activity Weaker in-person relationships Importantly, the report distinguishes between educational uses of technology and excessive recreational screen use. The quality of screen experiences matters, not just the number of hours. Warning Signs of Harmful Screen Use According to the advisory, parents should watch for behaviors such as: Constantly thinking about screens Becoming upset when screen time ends Repeated unsuccessful attempts to cut back Hiding online activities Losing interest in hobbies or face-to-face relationships Using screens to escape negative emotions These behaviors may indicate that screen use is becoming unhealthy rather than simply frequent. The "5 Ds" for Healthier Screen Habits The Surgeon General's accompanying toolkit encourages families to build healthier routines using five simple principles: Discuss healthy digital habits as a family. Do more activities together away from screens. Delay introducing devices and social media when possible. Divert children toward reading, outdoor play, sports, hobbies, and creative activities. Disconnect by creating screen-free times and spaces, especially during meals and before bedtime. Reading Together Is One of the Best Screen-Free Alternatives One of the easiest ways to reduce recreational screen time is to make reading a daily family routine. Reading aloud helps children: Build vocabulary Strengthen language development Improve listening skills Develop empathy Create lasting family memories Even just 15 to 20 minutes of shared reading each day can become a calming alternative to evening screen use. For families separated by work travel, military deployment, divorce, or distance, technology can still support connection in meaningful ways. A screen-free solution like the Recordable Book Buddy allows children to hear a parent's or grandparent's voice while reading any favorite picture book, combining the benefits of shared reading with the comfort of a familiar voice. It's Not About Eliminating Technology The Surgeon General is not calling for children to avoid technology altogether. Instead, the advisory encourages families to focus on intentional, balanced screen use while protecting time for: Family conversations Reading together Outdoor play Creative activities Exercise Sleep In-person friendships Technology should support childhood, not replace it. Learn More You can read the complete advisory here: U.S. Surgeon General's Advisory on the Harms of Screen Use: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/us-surgeon-generals-advisory-warning-on-the-harms-of-screen-use.pdf HHS Screen Use Resource Center: https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/reports-and-publications/screen-use-harms/index.html If you're looking for practical ways to encourage more screen-free family time, explore our collection of articles and discover how the Recordable Book Buddy helps families turn storytime into meaningful connection, one page at a time.

A Book Every Parent Is Talking About Jonathan Haidt’s book, The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness, has become one of the most talked-about parenting and mental health books in recent years. The reason is simple: it names something many parents, grandparents, teachers, and caregivers have been feeling for a while. Childhood has changed. Kids are spending less time playing outside, less time exploring the real world, less time in face-to-face conversation, and more time inside a digital world designed to hold their attention. Haidt argues that the rise of smartphones and social media has not just changed how kids communicate. It has changed how they grow up. You can buy The Anxious Generation here or view the book’s official website at AnxiousGeneration.com. What Is The Anxious Generation About? At the center of The Anxious Generation is Haidt’s argument that childhood shifted from a “play-based childhood” to a “phone-based childhood.” In a play-based childhood, kids learn through real-world experience. They climb, run, argue, make up, take small risks, get bored, solve problems, and build confidence away from constant adult supervision. In a phone-based childhood, much of that development moves onto screens. Kids spend more time scrolling, messaging, comparing, consuming, and reacting. Instead of free play, they get feeds. Instead of boredom, they get algorithms. Instead of independence, they get constant connection but not always the kind of connection that helps them feel grounded. Haidt’s point is not that technology is evil. His argument is more specific: smartphones and social media arrived so quickly that families, schools, and communities never had time to build healthy guardrails around them. Why Parents Are Paying Attention Parents do not need a research paper to know something feels off. Many can see it at home. Kids are more distracted. Bedtime is harder. Reading stamina is shorter. Anxiety feels more common. Family conversations compete with notifications. Even young children who do not have their own phones are growing up in homes where phones are always nearby. The public-health world has also been raising concerns. The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on Social Media and Youth Mental Health states that we do not yet have enough evidence to say social media is sufficiently safe for children and adolescents. The CDC’s Youth Risk Behavior Survey has also tracked serious concerns around teen sadness, hopelessness, and mental health. The American Psychological Association has taken a balanced view: social media can offer benefits for some teens, but it can also expose adolescents to harmful content, social comparison, sleep disruption, cyberbullying, and addictive design. That is what makes The Anxious Generation so useful. It takes a feeling many adults have and gives it structure, language, and a set of practical next steps. Haidt’s Four Big Recommendations One of the clearest parts of the book is Haidt’s call for new cultural norms. These are not just private rules for individual households. They are community-level changes that work best when parents, schools, and families act together. According to the official Anxious Generation movement site, Haidt recommends: 1. No Smartphones Before High School This does not necessarily mean no phone at all. It means delaying full internet-connected smartphones. A basic phone can still let kids contact parents without giving them constant access to apps, social media, and the open internet. For parents, this recommendation can be a relief. Many families feel pressured to give kids smartphones earlier than they want because “everyone else has one.” Haidt’s point is that parents need a shared standard so no one family has to fight that battle alone. 2. No Social Media Before 16 Social media is not just a communication tool. It is also a system of public comparison, popularity metrics, algorithmic content, and constant feedback. For adults, that can be stressful enough. For kids and young teens, whose brains and identities are still developing, it can be overwhelming. Delaying social media gives children more time to develop confidence, friendships, emotional regulation, and a sense of self before entering an environment built around comparison and performance. 3. Phone-Free Schools A phone-free school day gives kids a break from the digital world. It also gives teachers a better chance to teach and students a better chance to focus. This recommendation matters because even when kids are not actively using their phones, the presence of the phone can divide attention. Notifications, group chats, social pressure, and the fear of missing out do not stop just because class starts. A phone-free school is not anti-technology. It is pro-attention. 4. More Independence, Free Play, and Responsibility in the Real World This may be the most hopeful part of Haidt’s message. The solution is not just taking something away. It is giving something back. Kids need more real-world freedom. They need time to play, explore, create, help, build, read, wander, imagine, and solve small problems without a screen mediating every moment. That does not mean ignoring safety. It means understanding that independence is part of healthy development. Children build resilience by doing real things in the real world. Why This Matters for Reading and Family Connection At Read To Me, we believe childhood needs more connection, not more noise. Books are one of the simplest ways to create that connection. Reading with a child slows the room down. It gives a child your voice, your attention, your rhythm, and your presence. It creates a small pocket of calm in a world that constantly asks kids to swipe, scroll, and move on. That is one reason conversations around The Anxious Generation matter so much. The answer to screen overload is not just restriction. It is replacement. Replace scrolling with stories.Replace background noise with conversation.Replace passive entertainment with imagination.Replace digital distraction with real connection. A child does not need every moment optimized. Sometimes they need a lap, a book, a familiar voice, and a few quiet minutes where no one is competing with a screen. What Families Can Do Today You do not have to overhaul your entire home overnight. Small changes matter. Create Phone-Free Rituals Start with one part of the day. Dinner. Bedtime. The ride to school. Sunday morning. A nightly reading routine. The goal is not perfection. The goal is to protect a few moments where your child gets your full attention. Delay the Smartphone Conversation If your child is asking for a phone, talk with other parents. The pressure becomes easier when families agree together. Haidt’s recommendations work best when communities create shared expectations. You can also explore the parent resources at AnxiousGeneration.com/take-action. Make Reading a Screen-Free Anchor A reading routine gives kids something predictable and calming. It builds language, attention, imagination, and emotional connection. For grandparents, parents who travel, deployed service members, separated families, or caregivers who cannot always be there at bedtime, a recorded voice can still make storytime feel personal. That is the heart behind the Read To Me Recordable Book Buddy: helping families turn any children’s picture book into a personalized read along experience, using the voice of someone the child loves. Give Kids More Real-World Responsibility Let kids help cook. Let them carry the library books. Let them build something, decorate something, mail something, walk somewhere age-appropriate, or make a plan. Confidence does not come from being protected from every challenge. It comes from discovering, “I can do this.” Model the Behavior This is the hard one. Kids notice when adults say “too much screen time” while checking their own phones all evening. Family screen habits work better when everyone participates. A phone basket, a bedtime charging station outside the bedroom, or a shared reading hour can help make the change feel like a family decision instead of a punishment. The Bigger Takeaway The Anxious Generation is not just a book about phones. It is a book about childhood. It asks an uncomfortable question: What have kids lost as screens have taken up more of their time, attention, and emotional lives? But it also offers a hopeful answer. Families can reclaim real-world childhood. Schools can protect attention. Parents can coordinate instead of going it alone. Kids can have more freedom, more play, more responsibility, more books, more face-to-face connection, and more time to become themselves without a screen constantly pulling them away. For any parent, grandparent, teacher, or caregiver trying to understand childhood anxiety, screen time, social media, and the need for healthier family routines, The Anxious Generation is worth reading. You can buy The Anxious Generation here or learn more at the official book site, AnxiousGeneration.com. Related Resources Buy The Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt Official The Anxious Generation website Parent Action Guide from AnxiousGeneration.com U.S. Surgeon General Advisory on Social Media and Youth Mental Health CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results American Psychological Association Health Advisory on Social Media Use in Adolescence Read To Me Recordable Book Buddy