Blog

One more video. One more message. A quick check that turns into twenty minutes. For a teenager finishing the day, a phone can keep the conversation going long after the rest of the house has settled down. For parents, that raises a familiar question: what should bedtime look like when so much of a child’s social life happens on a screen? A study published in the Journal of Adolescent Health on November 6, 2026, examined 218 teenagers ages 13–18 across the United States. According to its published abstract, researchers monitored smartphone activity for an average of 17.5 days and compared it with survey-reported sleep. Greater smartphone use was associated with later sleep onset, shorter sleep, more variation between scheduled-day and free-day sleep timing, and more catch-up sleep on free nights. The strongest associations involved evening, nighttime and social media use. Several links with sleep timing and duration were stronger among female participants. Phone use was recorded automatically, but sleep was self-reported. These associations do not prove that smartphone use caused the sleep problems. The study did not test bedtime reading or the Book Buddy. For families thinking about screen time and teen sleep, a useful place to begin is the evening routine. What needs to happen before bed, and where does the phone fit? The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends putting screens away at least an hour before bedtime and charging devices outside the bedroom. Discuss a stopping time with your teen while everyone is awake and reasonably relaxed. Ask what they usually do on their phone at night. Homework, talking with friends and watching videos may each need a different place in the evening. Make the agreement specific. Choose a charging spot. Decide when schoolwork needs to wrap up. If your teen uses a phone as an alarm, consider a separate alarm clock, an option included in the AAP’s teen sleep guidance. That guidance also recommends 8–10 hours of sleep per night and a relaxing bedtime routine. Give your teen a say in what fills that quieter time. They might choose a printed book, a journal or a shower. Let them choose a paperback they actually want to read. Ask what interests them, browse a bookstore together or let them lead the next library visit. You can join in, too. Put your own phone on the charger and pick up something you have been meaning to read. Sitting together with separate books can be its own family ritual, even when nobody feels like talking. At Read To Me, we love the idea of giving stories a regular place at the end of the day. For families with younger children, that might mean choosing a picture book after pajamas and teeth brushing, then settling into the same favorite chair. Let your child turn the pages. Enjoy the voice they insist you use for the bear. Leave room for the question that has very little to do with the story. Those details are part of what makes the routine yours. When a loved one cannot be there, a recorded story can still be part of that reading time. The Recordable Book Buddy attaches to the back cover of virtually any children’s picture book. A parent, grandparent or other loved one records the story page by page, and the child presses the matching buttons to listen while following the physical pages. It creates a personalized read along experience with no apps, no screens and no Wi-Fi. A parent working evenings can record the story they usually read together. A grandparent can leave a favorite book with their own voice inside it. Add a familiar greeting, a silly character voice or the same goodnight you always say. The Recordable Book Buddy is available for under $30, in over 150 independent bookstores and online at RecordableBookBuddy.com. Start with one evening habit your family wants to make room for. Give it a time, a place and something to look forward to. A favorite story is a lovely place to begin. Your Voice. Their Favorite Story.

You sit down to read a picture book. Your child opens to a favorite page, and your phone lights up with a message from school. It is an ordinary parenting moment. The device that helps keep family life running is also asking for your attention during time you set aside together. For families thinking about parents’ phone use and kids, it helps to look carefully at the research before deciding what to change. Published October 21, 2026, in JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting, the study followed 131 parents for 10 days, with children ages 1–16. Parents reported phone use around their child and rated their child’s emotions. Consenting Android users also provided phone logs. Some self-reports linked greater phone use with parents perceiving more negative emotions or threats to their child’s needs, such as belonging. Patterns varied between mothers and fathers. No significant associations emerged for positive emotions. Phone logs showed no significant associations with the measured child outcomes. However, logs measured total use without establishing whether the child was present. Children did not report their own experiences. This short observational study cannot establish causation or long-term outcomes. The findings also cannot establish that every pattern of phone use is harmless. So where can a family begin? Start with a routine you would like to enjoy together and decide what would make it easier to follow through. The American Academy of Pediatrics’ Family Media Plan guidance recommends setting aside screen-free times and places, making room for activities such as reading and play, and including adults in the plan. Here are three ways to put those ideas into practice: Choose one part of the day. Try breakfast, an after-school snack or the first story at bedtime. Pick something that fits your actual schedule. Give phones somewhere to go. A shelf or charging spot can make your agreement concrete. Decide together how you will handle a call that needs answering. Let everyone help choose the activity. A child might want a game, a walk or the same picture book for the fifth night in a row. Give them a say. At Read To Me, we like starting with a book because the invitation is simple: sit beside me and see what happens on the next page. Let your child pick the story. Pause when an illustration catches their attention. Ask which character they would invite to dinner, or what they think is hiding behind that suspicious-looking door. If the story inspires a long conversation about something that happened at school, follow it. You can also make storytime easier to start. Keep a small basket of favorites beside the couch. Put the next bedtime book on the pillow before dinner. Ask a visiting grandparent to choose a story they would like to read. Choose one idea to try tonight, then notice what your family enjoys enough to repeat. For the times you are apart, a recorded story offers another way to share a familiar voice. The Recordable Book Buddy attaches to the back cover of virtually any children’s picture book. A loved one records the story page by page, and a child presses the matching buttons to listen while following the physical pages. It creates a personalized read along experience with no apps, no screens and no Wi-Fi. A grandparent can record a favorite story before heading home. A parent working evenings can leave a bedtime reading. A traveling family member can add a familiar character voice that makes everyone laugh. Reading and the Book Buddy were not tested in this study. The Book Buddy gives families a practical way to keep recorded stories available alongside the time they spend reading together. The Recordable Book Buddy is available for under $30, in over 150 independent bookstores and online at RecordableBookBuddy.com. Tonight, let your child choose a book, find a comfortable spot and give that story a place in your day. Your Voice. Their Favorite Story.

Screens have become such a routine part of childhood that conversations about “screen time” often focus on one question: How many hours is too many? But new research suggests the answer may be more complicated than simply counting minutes. A new study published August 29, 2026, in Scientific Reports examined how daily screen use relates to visual attention and visual processing in children between the ages of 4 and 9. The researchers found that greater screen time was associated with lower overall contrast sensitivity and with differences in how certain aspects of visual attention related to age. The findings do not prove that screens cause changes in children’s vision or attention. They do, however, add another piece to a growing body of research suggesting that what children spend their time looking at may be connected to how their developing brains learn to process the visual world around them. What Did the Researchers Study? Researchers from the University of Louisville, Brown University, Columbia University and other institutions studied 72 children between 4 and 9 years old. Parents reported how much screen time their children typically had each day. In this group, children averaged approximately 1.67 hours of screen use per day, with reported use ranging from about half an hour to 4.5 hours per day. The children then completed several laboratory tests designed to measure two important abilities: Visual selective attention is the ability to focus on relevant visual information while ignoring distractions. Contrast sensitivity is the ability to distinguish an object from its background when the difference in brightness or color is subtle. It helps us recognize objects and details even when they do not stand out sharply. Rather than asking parents whether their children seemed distracted, the researchers directly measured children's performance on these visual tasks. That is an important distinction. Much of the previous research connecting screen use and childhood attention has relied on questionnaires completed by parents or teachers. More Screen Time Was Associated With Lower Contrast Sensitivity One of the clearest findings involved contrast sensitivity. Researchers found that greater daily screen use was associated with lower overall contrast sensitivity. The effect was described as modest, but it appeared across the different visual channels researchers tested. In practical terms, contrast sensitivity is part of our ability to detect visual information when an object does not dramatically stand out from its surroundings. Importantly, the researchers are not saying that screen time is making children unable to see properly. This was an association found within a relatively small research sample. But the result raises an interesting question: Could the amount of time children spend looking at highly controlled, bright and visually stimulating digital environments be related to how their developing visual systems process subtler information in the physical world? More research will be needed to answer that. Screen Time Was Also Related to Visual Attention, but the Results Were Complicated The attention results were not nearly as simple as “more screens equal worse attention.” Children completed different types of visual search tasks in which they had to locate particular objects among distractions. Researchers found that the relationship between age and performance differed depending on screen exposure, the difficulty of the task and whether children were processing differences based on color or luminance, meaning differences in brightness. Luminance-based processing appeared particularly sensitive to differences in screen exposure. Color-based visual search development was generally more consistent across different amounts of screen use. In some circumstances, greater screen exposure was even associated with better performance among younger children. That is why the researchers themselves concluded that screen exposure does not appear to be uniformly beneficial or uniformly detrimental. Instead, it may interact with different visual and attentional processes in different ways. That nuance matters. A child playing an interactive educational game, video chatting with a grandparent and watching an endless stream of short videos may all technically be having “screen time,” but those experiences are very different. This particular study measured duration. It was not designed to determine whether different types of media produce different developmental effects. There Are Important Limitations Parents should not interpret this study as evidence that an extra hour on a tablet will damage a child's eyesight or attention. The research was cross-sectional, meaning researchers looked at children at one point in time rather than following them for several years. Because of that, it cannot establish cause and effect. It is possible that screen exposure influences attention. But it is also possible that children with different attentional characteristics are more attracted to screens or are given screens more frequently. Screen time was also reported by caregivers rather than measured automatically, which introduces the possibility of inaccurate estimates. There were relatively few children in the highest-screen-use groups, and some of the statistical findings became weaker when researchers analyzed screen time differently. Larger, long-term studies will be needed to understand what is actually causing these associations. The Bigger Lesson May Be About Balance Interestingly, this research comes at a time when pediatric experts are also moving toward a more nuanced discussion of children and technology. In its updated 2026 policy, the American Academy of Pediatrics describes children's technology use as part of a broader digital ecosystem rather than something that can always be understood through a single screen-time number. The AAP emphasizes considering what children are doing on screens and, just as importantly, what screen use may be replacing, including sleep, physical activity, family interaction and other developmentally important experiences. Its updated Family Media Plan recommends practical steps such as establishing screen-free areas and times, turning off autoplay and unnecessary notifications, choosing higher-quality content and deliberately leaving room for activities such as reading, outdoor play, hobbies and family games. That may be one of the most useful lessons parents can take from this new research. The goal does not have to be eliminating technology. It is making sure technology doesn't become the default for every quiet moment. Making More Room for Screen-Free Storytime Reading is one of the simplest alternatives families can build into that balance. A physical picture book asks something very different of a child than a tablet or phone. Children turn pages at their own pace. They examine illustrations. They listen to language. They search for details. They imagine what isn't explicitly shown. And when a parent, grandparent or other loved one reads with them, the experience becomes social as well as educational. At Read To Me, that is a major reason we believe technology should sometimes help families step away from screens rather than add another one. The Recordable Book Buddy turns virtually any children's picture book into a personalized read-along experience by allowing someone a child loves to record the story in their own voice. The child can then listen while following along with the physical book, with no tablet, app or Wi-Fi required. It isn't about pretending screens don't exist. It's about giving children appealing alternatives. A Few Screen-Free Swaps Families Can Try Instead of automatically reaching for a screen during downtime, families can experiment with simple replacements: Keep a basket of favorite books somewhere children can easily reach them. Establish a screen-free reading period before bed. Take books along for car rides, restaurants and waiting rooms. Let children draw scenes or characters from a story after reading it. Encourage independent outdoor play and exploration. Build puzzles, play board games or create something together. Have grandparents or distant family members record favorite stories for children to listen to when they are apart. None of these activities requires completely removing digital media from family life. They simply ensure that screens aren't crowding out everything else. What Parents Should Take Away From the New Research This new study doesn't provide a magic number for the “correct” amount of screen time. It gives us something potentially more useful. Children's visual attention and visual processing are still developing throughout childhood, and screen exposure appears to be associated with some of those developmental differences. Scientists still need to determine why those associations exist, which kinds of screen use matter most and whether screen exposure actually causes the differences researchers observed. For parents, there is no reason to panic over every cartoon or video game. But there is plenty of reason to keep making room for the physical world. Books. Conversation. Outdoor play. Creativity. Family games. Boredom. Imagination. And sometimes simply sitting down together and turning a page. Because childhood shouldn't happen entirely through a screen.

For many families, the most challenging screen-time decisions do not happen when everyone is calm and rested. They happen at 6 p.m. Dinner needs to be made. Someone is tired. Someone else is having a meltdown. A parent is trying to finish one last work email, and handing a child a tablet can create a few desperately needed minutes of quiet. New research from Florida International University suggests that these stressful moments may play a bigger role in children's screen habits than we realize. A study published in Family Relations found that parents experiencing higher levels of stress were less likely to consistently enforce screen-time limits, while parents who felt overwhelmed by their child's behavior were more likely to use screens to help manage difficult moments. The takeaway isn't that parents need another reason to feel guilty about screen time. It may actually be the opposite. The research suggests that if we want to help children develop healthier relationships with technology, we may need to pay more attention to the stress parents are experiencing too. What Did the Researchers Study? Researchers from Florida International University's Center for Children and Families surveyed 822 caregivers across the United States who had children between the ages of 4 and 8. Parents answered questions about their own parenting stress, their child's behavior and the strategies they used to manage screen media. Importantly, the researchers separated parenting stress into different categories, including: Stress related to a parent's own emotional distress Stress associated with difficult or challenging child behavior Stress related to the parent-child relationship Researchers then examined how these different types of stress were associated with two common parenting behaviors: using screens to regulate a child's behavior and setting limits around screen use. Parent Stress Appears to Matter Even When Child Behavior Is Taken Into Account One of the most interesting findings was that the connection between parenting stress and screen management remained even after researchers accounted for children's behavioral problems. Parents experiencing greater personal distress tended to enforce fewer screen-time limits. Meanwhile, parents who perceived their child as particularly difficult to manage were more likely to use screens as a way of calming or managing their child's behavior. In other words, it isn't necessarily just a child's tantrum, hyperactivity or difficult behavior that determines whether the tablet comes out. How overwhelmed the parent feels may also influence that decision. That distinction matters. For years, much of the conversation surrounding children's screen time has focused on kids: How much are they watching? What are they watching? Why won't they put the tablet down? This research suggests we may need to zoom out and look at the entire family environment. The 6 P.M. Screen-Time Problem Most parents probably recognize the situation. You can have perfectly reasonable screen-time rules at 10 a.m. on Saturday morning. Those rules become considerably harder to enforce when you're exhausted, preparing dinner, trying to finish work and dealing with a child who is melting down. Screens are remarkably effective at occupying children. And sometimes parents simply need 20 quiet minutes. The researchers don't suggest that reaching for a screen during one of those moments is inherently harmful. Instead, they argue that families may benefit from thinking more intentionally about what children are doing on screens and how digital media fits into family life, rather than focusing exclusively on the number of minutes spent looking at a screen. That's an important shift. Screen Time Isn't All the Same Watching an endless stream of short-form videos isn't necessarily equivalent to video chatting with Grandma, playing a creative game or watching an educational program with a parent. The American Academy of Pediatrics has increasingly encouraged families to consider children's digital media through what it calls the 5 Cs of Media Use: Child: Consider your individual child's age, personality and developmental needs. Content: Pay attention to what your child is actually watching or doing. Calm: Consider whether screens are becoming the primary way your child learns to manage difficult emotions. Crowding Out: Ask what screen time is replacing, including sleep, physical activity, reading or family interaction. Communication: Keep talking with children about technology and how they use it. It's a more nuanced approach than simply watching a timer. Five Ways Parents Can Make Screen Time Easier to Manage The FIU findings point toward a practical lesson: make screen decisions before the stressful moment arrives. 1. Set a Few Simple Rules When Everyone Is Calm Trying to negotiate screen limits during a meltdown is difficult for both parents and children. Instead, establish predictable rules ahead of time. Maybe screens aren't used during dinner. Maybe devices stay out of bedrooms at night. Maybe there is a regular time each afternoon when screens are available. The American Academy of Pediatrics offers a free Family Media Plan designed to help families establish exactly these kinds of boundaries. 2. Have Easy Screen-Free Alternatives Ready When a parent is exhausted, complicated activities aren't realistic. The best alternative to a tablet may be something a child can begin independently. Keep a few easy options accessible, such as: Picture books Coloring supplies Puzzles Building toys Audiobooks or recorded stories Activity books Music Simple crafts The easier an alternative is to start, the more useful it becomes during the moments when parents need a break. 3. Curate Screen Content Before You Need It If your child is going to use a screen, deciding what they will watch ahead of time can remove another decision from an already stressful moment. Parents can create a short list of trusted shows, apps and educational content rather than relying on whatever an algorithm recommends next. Quality matters. 4. Create Screen-Free Anchors in the Day Trying to micromanage every minute of screen use can become exhausting. A simpler approach may be to protect a few predictable parts of the day. Dinner might be screen-free. The final 30 minutes before bedtime might be screen-free. A family walk, reading time or Saturday morning breakfast might be screen-free. These routines help ensure that technology doesn't gradually crowd out activities that matter to the family. 5. Don't Ignore Parent Stress This may be the biggest lesson from the FIU study. If a parent's stress level influences how screens are used, then healthier family technology habits aren't simply about stronger parental controls. Sometimes parents need more support. That could mean sharing responsibilities with a partner, asking family members for help, simplifying an evening routine or simply recognizing which parts of the day consistently push everyone toward their limits. Reducing stress may make it easier to maintain the screen boundaries a family already wants. What This Study Does Not Prove It's important not to read too much into the findings. The research was based on an online survey in which caregivers reported their own stress, their children's behavior and their screen-management practices. It therefore identifies associations, but it cannot prove that parental stress directly causes children to receive more screen time. There may also be a feedback loop. A stressful child behavior could make a parent more likely to offer a screen. Increased reliance on screens could then make boundaries harder to maintain, potentially creating additional conflict around technology. More research will be needed to understand those relationships over time. Still, the study adds an important piece to the screen-time conversation. Maybe Screen Time Isn't Just a Kid Problem Parents are often told what they should be doing with technology. Set limits. Turn off the tablet. Keep phones away from the dinner table. Choose educational programs. Those recommendations can be useful, but they can overlook the reality of family life. Sometimes the parent handing over the tablet already knows the rules. They're just exhausted. The new research from Florida International University suggests that supporting healthy technology habits may require something more practical than simply telling families to reduce screen time. It means helping parents create routines that still work on stressful days, keeping easy screen-free alternatives available and making decisions about technology before everyone reaches their breaking point. Because when it comes to raising children in a digital world, supporting the parent may be one of the most effective ways to support the child. About the Research The study, “Parenting in the digital age: How parenting stress shapes screen media parenting strategies,” was conducted by Enid A. Moreira, Alexandra Schek, Daniel M. Bagner and Shayl F. Griffith and published in Family Relations in 2026. The research involved 822 U.S. caregivers of children ages 4 to 8.

Toddler Screen Time and Emotional Development: What a New Study Found Toddlers change quickly. Between their first and third birthdays, they become more mobile, more independent and much more interested in the world around them. This is also a period when many children begin spending more time watching television, videos and other digital media. A new study published in BMC Public Health examined how changes in screen time and physical activity during toddlerhood were associated with children’s social-emotional development. The researchers found two separate patterns: toddlers whose daily screen time increased more tended to have slightly higher social-emotional difficulty scores, while toddlers whose moderate-to-vigorous physical activity increased tended to have lower difficulty scores. The study does not prove that screens directly cause behavioral problems or that additional exercise prevents them. However, it adds to growing evidence that the habits children develop during toddlerhood may matter for emotional regulation, behavior and overall well-being. What did the toddler screen time study examine? The study, titled “Associations of Changes in Physical Activity and Screen Time and Social-Emotional Development Among Toddlers,” was published online in July 2026. Researchers analyzed data from the Child and Mother Physical Activity Study, a longitudinal project involving families in the Chicago metropolitan area. The final analysis included 116 children. Researchers examined changes between approximately 1½ and 2½ years of age. The study measured: Daily television, smartphone and tablet viewing, as reported by mothers Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, measured with hip-worn accelerometers Social-emotional functioning, measured with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire The questionnaire assesses areas such as emotional difficulties, conduct problems, hyperactivity, peer difficulties and prosocial behavior. A higher total difficulty score indicates more reported behavioral or emotional difficulties. Screen time increased substantially during toddlerhood At the beginning of the study period, children averaged approximately 43 minutes of screen time per day. One year later, average daily screen time had risen to approximately 69 minutes. That represents an average increase of about 25 minutes per day. Roughly three-quarters of the children’s screen exposure came from television, rather than smartphones or tablets. The researchers noted that their measurement focused mainly on watching videos and television, so it may not have captured every form of digital media use. The increase is important because toddlerhood is often when screens begin to become part of everyday routines. Parents may introduce videos during meals, while preparing dinner, during travel or when a child is upset or bored. Occasional screen use is not the same as constant or unrestricted access. Still, small additions throughout the day can quickly add up. More screen time was associated with more difficulties After accounting for factors including the child’s age, sex, neighborhood resources and earlier behavioral scores, researchers estimated that a 30-minute annualized increase in daily screen time was associated with a 0.5-point increase in the child’s total difficulty score. The effect was statistically significant but relatively small. The researchers emphasized that the clinical importance of a half-point difference is difficult to determine for an individual child. However, even small associations may matter at the population level because screen use is common and highly modifiable. The association appeared to be driven primarily by externalizing behaviors, a category that includes conduct difficulties and hyperactivity, rather than internalizing difficulties such as anxiety or emotional distress. This does not mean that adding 30 minutes of television will automatically cause a toddler to develop behavioral problems. It means that, across this group of children, larger increases in screen exposure were associated with somewhat less favorable social-emotional scores. More physical activity was associated with better scores The study also found that toddlers became more active as they grew. Average moderate-to-vigorous physical activity increased from approximately 72 minutes to 90 minutes per day. A 30-minute annualized increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was associated with a one-point reduction in total difficulty scores. Increased activity was also associated with lower externalizing behavior scores. For toddlers, moderate-to-vigorous activity does not need to look like formal exercise. It can include: Running and chasing games Dancing Climbing Playing with balls Walking outdoors Riding toys Playground activities Active pretend play Simple indoor obstacle courses Movement gives toddlers opportunities to practice coordination, manage frustration, solve problems and interact with other people. The researchers suggest that active play may support the integration of children’s physical, cognitive and emotional development. Exercise did not appear to cancel out screen time One of the study’s most useful findings was that changes in screen time and physical activity were not strongly connected. Children who became more active did not necessarily spend less time on screens. Some toddlers may have had both high levels of physical activity and relatively high screen exposure. That means parents should not assume that an active morning at the playground automatically offsets several hours of screen use later in the day. The study suggests that screen exposure and physical activity may be separate parts of a child’s routine, each with its own potential relationship to social-emotional development. Families may benefit from addressing both: Creating more opportunities for movement and active play Preventing screen time from expanding unnecessarily Researchers described this as a “dual-focus” approach rather than simply replacing one behavior with the other. Why might screen time affect toddler behavior? The study was not designed to determine precisely why screen use was associated with social-emotional difficulties. However, the authors discussed several possible explanations. Screens may crowd out developmental experiences Time spent watching videos can replace activities such as: Talking with caregivers Reading books Imaginative play Exploring physical objects Practicing language Playing with other children Learning to manage boredom These everyday experiences help toddlers develop communication, patience, problem-solving and emotional regulation. Screen use may be most concerning when it repeatedly displaces these experiences, rather than because every minute of screen exposure is inherently harmful. Fast-paced content may be overstimulating Rapidly changing images, loud sounds and highly attention-grabbing content may place heavy demands on young children’s still-developing attention and self-regulation systems. The study’s authors presented this as a possible explanation, not a proven mechanism. More research is needed to determine how content speed, quality and design affect toddlers differently. Screens may become a default calming tool Parents often reach for a phone or video when a toddler becomes restless, frustrated or upset. This is understandable, especially during travel, work demands or stressful moments. But when screens become the primary response to every difficult emotion, children may have fewer opportunities to practice calming themselves with support from a caregiver. The American Academy of Pediatrics’ current media guidance encourages parents to consider the child, the content, how the child learns to calm down, what media is crowding out and ongoing communication. The AAP refers to these principles as the “5 C’s of Media Guidance.” What are the current screen time recommendations for toddlers? The World Health Organization’s guidelines for children under age 5 recommend: No sedentary screen time for 1-year-olds No more than one hour per day for 2-year-olds, with less being preferable At least 180 minutes of varied physical activity throughout the day for children ages 1 and 2 The 180-minute activity recommendation includes movement at different intensity levels. It does not mean a toddler must perform three hours of strenuous exercise. The goal is frequent movement and play spread throughout the day. The AAP’s latest guidance also stresses that parents should look beyond a single number. Content quality, adult involvement, family circumstances and what media replaces all affect the experience. A short, age-appropriate program watched with a caregiver is different from hours of unsupervised autoplay videos. Practical ways to reduce toddler screen time Reducing screen use does not require eliminating every device overnight. Gradual, predictable changes are often easier for both parents and children. Protect a few screen-free parts of the day Start with routines that offer the greatest developmental benefits, such as: Meals The hour before bedtime Outdoor time Reading time The first part of the morning Clear routines are often easier for toddlers to accept than limits that change from day to day. Replace the screen instead of simply removing it Toddlers are less likely to protest when they are offered something concrete to do. Possible screen-free alternatives include: Board books Music and dancing Stickers Blocks Water play Play dough Toy animals Simple puzzles Drawing Helping with household tasks The replacement does not need to be elaborate. Toddlers often get more developmental value from a cardboard box and an involved adult than from an expensive electronic toy. Add short bursts of activity Movement can be spread across the day. Ten minutes of dancing, a short walk and an indoor chasing game all count. Parents do not need to create a formal exercise program. The main goal is to give toddlers frequent opportunities to move freely and safely. Avoid open access to phones and tablets When a device is always visible and available, toddlers are more likely to request it repeatedly. Keeping devices out of reach and using them at predictable times can reduce negotiations and tantrums. The AAP also recommends turning off autoplay and notifications, which are designed to keep users engaged longer. Make reading an easy default Reading and storytelling provide attention, language, emotional connection and quiet entertainment without a screen. The WHO specifically encourages reading and storytelling with a caregiver during sedentary time. When a parent or grandparent cannot always be present, the Recordable Book Buddy offers another screen-free option. It attaches to the back cover of any children’s picture book and turns it into a personalized read along experience, starring you. A loved one records the story page by page, allowing the child to hear a familiar voice while following along with the physical book. Important limitations of the study Parents should not interpret this research as definitive proof that screen time causes social-emotional problems. The study had several important limitations: It included only 116 children. The participants were drawn from one metropolitan area. Many mothers were highly educated and lived in well-resourced neighborhoods. Screen time was reported by mothers rather than measured electronically. Screen use in childcare settings may have been missed. Researchers measured video viewing but did not examine content quality. The follow-up period was only about one year. The study was observational, so other family or environmental factors may have contributed to the results. The physical-activity measurement was a major strength because it used accelerometers rather than relying only on parent estimates. Still, the authors said that larger and more socioeconomically diverse studies are needed. The paper is also currently presented as an unedited article-in-press manuscript and may receive additional copyediting before final publication. The takeaway for parents The study does not suggest that parents should panic over an occasional cartoon or feel guilty whenever they need a break. Its more practical message is that routines can gradually shift during toddlerhood. An extra video here and an additional half hour there can become a significant increase over the course of a year. At the same time, physical activity appears to have its own potential benefits. More movement does not automatically mean less screen exposure, so families may need to work on both habits separately. The goal is not a perfectly screen-free childhood. It is a daily routine in which screens do not consistently replace movement, conversation, reading, imaginative play, sleep and emotional connection. For toddlers, those real-world experiences remain difficult for any screen to reproduce. Frequently asked questions Does screen time cause behavioral problems in toddlers? This study found an association between increases in screen time and higher social-emotional difficulty scores. It did not prove that screen time directly caused the difficulties. How much screen time should a 2-year-old have? The WHO recommends no more than one hour of sedentary screen time per day for 2-year-olds, with less considered better. Families should also consider content quality, adult involvement and what screen use is replacing. How much physical activity does a toddler need? The WHO recommends at least 180 minutes of varied physical activity spread throughout the day for children ages 1 and 2. This includes ordinary movement and active play, not just vigorous exercise. Can physical activity offset too much screen time? The new study suggests that the two behaviors may operate independently. Increasing physical activity may be beneficial, but it should not be treated as a way to cancel out excessive screen exposure. What are good screen-free activities for toddlers? Reading, storytelling, dancing, outdoor play, blocks, puzzles, music, drawing, sensory play and simple household tasks can all provide screen-free engagement. Sources and further reading Original BMC Public Health study World Health Organization guidelines for children under 5 WHO recommendations at a glance American Academy of Pediatrics: Helping Kids Thrive in a Digital World AAP 5 C’s guidance for toddlers and preschoolers

Most conversations about children and technology focus on how much time kids spend looking at screens. But new research raises another important question: How does a parent’s phone use affect a child who is trying to connect with them? A 2026 study published in Frontiers in Psychology found that teenagers who perceived their caregivers as frequently distracted by phones and other devices were also more likely to report insecure attachment to those caregivers. The association appeared in relationships with both mother-like and father-like caregivers. The study does not prove that checking a phone causes attachment problems. However, it adds to growing evidence that what researchers call parental technoference may affect how children experience attention, availability and emotional connection at home. What Is Parental Technoference? “Technoference” describes situations in which technology interrupts or interferes with an in-person relationship. A related term, “phubbing,” combines “phone” and “snubbing” and refers to ignoring someone in favor of a phone. A parent can be physically in the same room as their child while appearing mentally somewhere else. Researchers sometimes describe this experience as “absent presence.” This might happen when a parent: Checks notifications while a child is talking Scrolls during dinner or family time Answers messages throughout a child’s performance or activity Continues looking at a device when a child asks for attention Regularly interrupts conversations to respond to the phone These moments may seem small to an adult, especially when the phone is being used for work, scheduling or family responsibilities. But repeated interruptions may feel different from a child’s perspective. What Did the Study Examine? The researchers surveyed 600 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 17 from the general U.S. population. Participants answered questions about their primary caregiver’s device habits and their own relationship with that caregiver. The teenagers rated statements such as: Their caregiver’s device use negatively affects their relationship Their caregiver ignores them while using a device Their caregiver does not spend enough time with them because of device use They feel unimportant when their caregiver will not put down a device They have conflicts with their caregiver about device use The researchers used these responses to evaluate a new measurement tool called the Device Attachment Interference Scale, or DAIS. They then compared the results with measures of anxious and avoidant attachment. What Did the Researchers Find? Higher levels of perceived caregiver device interference were significantly associated with higher levels of both anxious and avoidant attachment. The pattern was found among teenagers who identified a mother-like figure as their primary caregiver and among those who identified a father-like figure. The researchers controlled for the adolescents’ age and gender in their analysis. In practical terms, adolescents who felt that devices repeatedly competed for their caregiver’s attention were more likely to describe relationship patterns involving emotional insecurity. Anxious attachment may involve: Worrying about whether a caregiver is emotionally available Seeking frequent reassurance Feeling uncertain about the strength of the relationship Becoming especially sensitive to signs of rejection or inattention Avoidant attachment may involve: Becoming emotionally distant Avoiding dependence on a caregiver Hesitating to ask for comfort or support Learning to expect that bids for attention will not be answered The study’s central issue was not simply how many hours parents used their phones. It was whether teenagers felt that a device made their caregiver less attentive, less responsive or less available when connection was needed. Nearly Half of Teens Notice Distracted Parenting The new findings reflect an experience many families already recognize. A 2024 Pew Research Center survey found that 46% of teenagers said a parent was at least sometimes distracted by a phone while the teen was trying to talk to them. Parents viewed their own habits more favorably, with 31% saying this happened regularly. An earlier Pew survey found that 68% of parents said they were at least sometimes distracted by their smartphone while spending time with their children. Parents are not necessarily choosing their phones over their children intentionally. Smartphones now function as workstations, calendars, cameras, maps, news sources, banking tools and communication devices. The problem may be less about owning or using a phone and more about allowing it to interrupt the moments when children are seeking attention and connection. What the Research Does Not Prove This study should not be interpreted as proof that parental phone use directly causes insecure attachment. The researchers clearly identified several limitations: The study was cross-sectional, meaning information was collected at one point in time. The results show an association, not cause and effect. Both device interference and attachment were reported by the adolescents themselves. Teenagers who already feel insecure may be more sensitive to parental distraction. Other family or relationship factors may influence both attachment and perceptions of phone use. The new Device Attachment Interference Scale requires additional validation. The researchers also noted that some questions about emotional reactions to device use may partially overlap with questions measuring anxious attachment. Longer-term studies involving parents, adolescents and direct observations of family interactions will be needed. The responsible conclusion is not that every phone interruption damages a child. It is that frequent perceived inattention was meaningfully connected with how teenagers described the security of their caregiver relationship. Five Ways Parents Can Reduce Phone Distraction Parents do not need to abandon technology. A more realistic goal is to protect certain interactions from unnecessary interruption. 1. Respond to bids for attention When a child says, “Look at this,” asks a question or begins telling a story, pause before checking the phone. Not every conversation can happen immediately. When attention must be delayed, acknowledge the child directly: “I need two minutes to finish this message, and then I want to hear the whole story.” A clear response is different from appearing not to notice. 2. Establish phone-free family moments Designate a few predictable times when phones are put away or silenced. These might include: Family meals Bedtime routines Reading time School pickup Short car trips The first few minutes after arriving home Important conversations The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends creating screen-free zones and times, including family meals and bedtime, to support face-to-face connection, learning and sleep. 3. Turn off unnecessary notifications Every sound, banner and vibration creates a small invitation to leave the current conversation. Use “Do Not Disturb,”